Showing posts with label Owen Jorgensen. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Owen Jorgensen. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 3, 2018

Why Ern Baxter Left the Ministry of William Branham

A Look at Problematic Concerns About Faith and 'Borderline Psychic' Phenomena

By Roscoe Barnes III
Author, F.F. Bosworth: The Man Behind Christ the Healer
Copyright © 2018

#FFBosworth
#BosworthMatters

This image is taken from the April 1949 issue of The Voice of Healing.

NOTE: The material shared in this article is based primarily on an undated interview Ern Baxter (1914-1993) had with Dewey Friedel (a source on YouTube suggests the interview occurred around 1991. See here). A transcript of the interview, which was culled from four videos entitled “Life on Wings – Interviews with Dr. Ern Baxter,” was published as a book. The book, in some places, has been described as Life on Wings Transcripts. It has also been titled, “Warfare follows Ern Baxter wherever he goes … he is constantly in the middle of warfare.” The book was released by Ritch Carlton, Baxter’s administrator. Carlton has given me permission to share this material.

---------------------------------------

Even in the early days of his work with Evangelist William Branham, Ern Baxter felt something was wrong. He initially felt uncomfortable with Branham’s understanding of faith, particularly as it related to divine healing. However, he later found Branham’s “gift of healing” to be quite disturbing. Baxter talked about both issues in an interview with Dewey Friedel, and he said those issues prompted him to leave the ministry of Branham. While he believed that Branham sincerely loved the Lord Jesus, he could not blindly accept Branham’s teachings or his supernatural gift that Branham claimed was directed by an angel.

Background

Baxter was a Canadian minister who supported Branham when Gordon Lindsay brought the evangelist to Vancouver, B.C. in November 1947. At the time, Branham’s ministry was just starting to gain traction and become well-known. Lindsay reported on the meetings in the April 1948 issue of The Voice of Healing Magazine. In an article titled, “Eighteen Days of Branham Meetings in the Northwest Yield Great Results,” Lindsay reported the following:

The great Northwest meetings will long be remembered by the many thousands of people that attended. The first of the services of three or four-day campaigns was held in Vancouver, B.C. Much of the success of this meeting came as the result of the fine work and preparation made by the local committee which included Rev. Walter McAlister, Rev. W. J. Ern Baxter, and Rev. Clarence Hall. The report of the meeting by Rev. Baxter has appeared in print elsewhere, but it so admirably describes the Vancouver campaign that we reproduce part of it here:

“Scenes of indescribable glory were witnessed during the all-too-brief, four-day, city-wide campaign with Rev. William Branham. As in other cities, so in Vancouver, the largest available auditoriums were inadequate to accommodate the teeming multitudes that waited on the ministry of our brother. Surrounding towns and villages seemed to literally empty into Vancouver, until the whole city was conscious of the spiritual impact of thousands of praying, believing people. Ministerial delegations from various cities attended with a view to securing the ministry of Brother Branham for similar meetings in their various fields of labor. Thousands were unable to gain access to the meetings, and this in spite of transportation strike involving all street cars and buses.

It appears that Baxter’s praise of Branham spread far and wide. Lindsay would later include his comments in the book, William Branham, A Man Sent From God (1950). In addition to commenting on the massive crowds that attended the meetings, Baxter also noted claims of miraculous healings, which were nothing short of astounding. He explained that the number of healings that occurred was so great, an exact count or figure could not be given. He wrote:

“Many testimonies of healing have continued to come to the attention of local pastors, and many marvelous works were wrought by the immediate action of the Holy Spirit at the time of prayer. To undertake any kind of a report on the healings experience would be an impossible task, for should one speak of crossed eyes straightened, or of bed-ridden invalids raised, or of the deaf hearing, or of the dumb speaking? Or should one seek to recount the thrilling testimonies of those relieved of cancers, tumors and goiters? The task is too great, and when seeming completed, it has only begun. Final records will only be read when we stand before the Giver of every good and perfect gift.”

Baxter’s work with Branham

Baxter later joined the Branham team. According to Branham biographer Owen Jorgensen, Baxter “was so impressed that he – like Jack Moore and Gordon Lindsay – canceled all his own commitments so he could follow the Branham campaigns from city to city.” Baxter would serve as manager, campaign organizer and teacher. It was Lindsay who recommended Baxter as campaign manager, according to Jorgensen. The recommendation came around the end of September 1948. In his book, Supernatural: The Life of William Branham – Book Four (Tucson Tabernacle, 2001), Jorgensen wrote:

Then Lindsay, who was now busy publishing The Voice of Healing magazine, suggested that Bill consider using Ern Baxter as his campaign manager. Not only did Ern Baxter have organization skills, he was also a dynamic preacher, and he had offered to help in any way he could. After praying about it, Bill agreed to the switch.

Reverend Baxter did prove to be a good campaign manager. He and Fred Bosworth planned to work Bill slowly back into his deliverance ministry. Protecting Bill’s heath from overwork was their main concern.

Baxter and F.F. Bosworth were two of the most prominent members of Branham’s team. They traveled with Branham throughout the United States and they worked with him in South Africa and other countries. The assistance of Baxter and Bosworth was important, according to C. Douglas Weaver. In his book, The Healer-Prophet: William Marrion Branham – A Study of the Prophetic in American Pentecostalism (Mercer University Press, 2000), he wrote: “Several factors contributed to taking Branham to the pinnacle of success. The dynamic revival trio of Branham, Bosworth, and Baxter was a highlight of the early years.” Weaver also underscored the contributions of Lindsay, Jack Moore, and his daughter Anna Jeanne who “skillfully publicized Branham as “a man sent from God.”

Weaver noted that Branham’s role in the revival meetings was basically limited to his ministry of healing. “Although the members of Branham’s team varied from time to time, F.F. Bosworth, W.J. Ern Baxter, and Gordon Lindsay were the most prominent co-workers,” he wrote. Typically, Baxter and Bosworth would teach or preach in the morning and afternoon services, and Branham would minister in the evening services. “Baxter usually fulfilled a preaching role, emphasizing Bible teaching and evangelism,” Weaver observed.

It is worth pointing out that Baxter once believed so strongly in Branham’s gift that he used Scripture to encourage him in the use of the gift. Branham was going through a period where he doubted his abilities, according to Jorgensen. He was starting to question whether he still had the gift of healing. That’s when Baxter stepped in with a word of encouragement. He said:

“Brother Branham, I can assure you that the ‘gift of healing’ hasn’t gone from you. Romans 11:29 says that ‘the gifts and calling of God are without repentance,’ meaning that they are not based upon our actions. God would be untrue to His promise if He took the gift from you. It can’t leave you. Samson slept all night with a harlot, but his strength didn’t leave him. The next morning he tore off the city gates and carried them to the top of a hill.”

Baxter feeling ‘disturbed’

In his discussion about Branham, Baxter used the term “disturbed” to describe his feelings and concerns about certain elements in Branham’s ministry. As noted above, Baxter was concerned about Branham’s teaching on faith and the source of his spiritual gift of healing. The issue of faith, according to Baxter, seemed problematic from the beginning.

Baxter felt something was wrong and with his growing concern about the supernatural elements, he felt the need to eventually vacate his position on Branham’s ministry team. In the following excerpt, Baxter speaks about Branham’s testimony and his rise to fame. He also comments on the state of Pentecostals and their waning power during that time. His comments provide context for Branham's role as the leader of the post-World War II healing revival.


Interview (Pages 40-41)
Dewey Friedel:

Dr. Baxter, you were discussing William Branham, your relationship with him and how you went to many nations and seeing the hand of God in the meetings and yet you were beginning to be disturbed, in your spirit and could you talk some about that?

Ern Baxter:

Well this isn’t coming out of a set of notes, it’s just coming out of my memory. I think one of the things that began to disturb me was the matter of faith. Basically my understanding of the matter of faith – when I began to travel with William Branham – was that he had received a special commission from an angel who had appeared to him, telling him that he was to take his gift of healing to the peoples of the world and that if he was faith, they could believe that nothing could stand before his prayers, including cancer and in the early days of my association with him there was a high excitement and anticipation because I think (as I have already mentioned) the supernatural element in Pentecostalism had sort of waned and my last contact with Pentecostalism was a conference where I attended and they had a committee to find out why people weren’t getting converted and a committee to find out why they weren’t being filled with the Spirit – it was almost like everyone was on a committee to find out what was wrong.

And when I read in Time magazine about William Branham – to read that same thing today would be received in an altogether way than it was then, because there no one doing that.

Baxter’s growing concern

While it is clear that Baxter believed in Branham’s ministry during their early years of ministry, it appears that whatever it was that made him uncomfortable began to grow. In discussing the issue of faith, he attributes the teaching to Branham. Surprisingly, he does not mention Bosworth, who had an impact on Branham’s understanding of faith and divine healing. In the excerpt that follows, Baxter elaborates on the issue of faith and how it bothered him.

Interview (Page P. 47)

Friedel:
Now Branham was not really in the Latter Rain – he was a simple man that was doing evangelistic work but increasingly you were troubled with something you discerned.

Baxter:
Branham was a missionary Baptist, which is a denomination I believe mainly in the South and he has this gift of healing as he later told me. This was in operation in him as a boy so it was something that he always had. When he became a Christian minister he incorporated it into the Christian thing.

One of the early things that started to bother me was the whole question of faith. And the whole idea was that you could get healed if you had faith. And faith became the focus point. And so it became a matter of having faith in your faith. And if your faith was in good shape then you had faith in your faith. But the Bible doesn’t talk about having faith in your faith; it talks about faith in God.

So while I was quite disturbed about it I thought I’d better arm myself biblically.

Baxter’s exit

Baxter said that in Branham’s case, faith was “becoming a metaphysical thing – it was becoming a form of Couism.” In other words, he seemed to teach, “If I keep repeating day by day that I’m getting better and better” – it was a kind of metaphysical positivism,” Baxter explained. He noted: “This bothered me and I saw it was an ‘out’ to accommodate people who weren’t getting healed. ‘There must have been something wrong with their faith.’ And so that disturbed me.”

For Baxter, Branham’s understanding of faith was not the only thing that bothered him. He said “there were aspects of the supernatural that began to disturb me.” He explained:

And I don’t know just how far to go with this but I began to be disturbed with some of the phenomenon that were occurring – some of them I felt were good, others I felt were borderline psychic. And I became quite disturbed about it. I continued with Branham until I felt that in my conscience I couldn’t go on.”

The exact time of Baxter’s departure is not known, but according to Owen Jorgensen, he stepped down from his position as manager in 1954. Jorgensen provided no reason or explanation. He simply wrote that Baxter “had resigned as his campaign manager.”

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Would you like to know more
about F.F. Bosworth?

Follow the Bosworth Matters blog!

You can start right here:
ffbosworth.strikingly.com

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

For more information:
Visit ffbosworth.strikingly.com. The Bosworth page is here. Questions about the research and commentary on F.F. Bosworth may be directed to Roscoe Barnes III, Ph.D., via email at doctorbarnes3@gmail.com or roscoebarnes3@yahoo.com. For updates on F.F. Bosworth history, simply follow this blog or @Roscoebarnes3 on Twitter. #ChristTheHealer

Wednesday, June 13, 2018

“Brother Branham, you’re wrong.”

F.F. Bosworth’s Surprising Rebuke of William Branham 

By Roscoe Barnes III
Author, F.F. Bosworth: The Man Behind Christ the Healer
Copyright © 2018

#FFBosworth
#BosworthMatters


F.F. Bosworth, left, and William Branham

In his book, Supernatural: The Life of William Branham (Tucson Tabernacle, 2001), Owen Jorgensen recounted an argument between William Branham and his ministry team in South Africa that prompted a swift and surprising reaction from F.F. Bosworth.

Branham wanted to stay in Johannesburg for a couple of weeks, go hunting for 10 days, and then go to Durban, but his team had different plans and a different itinerary. The incident, which occurred in October 1951, raised concerns about the team’s commitment to the local churches. Money had been spent and schedules had been approved. But those issues did not seem to matter to Branham, who wanted to go in the opposite direction.

When Branham insisted God had spoken to him and told him that he should not follow the approved schedules, Bosworth spoke up and rebuked him in the presence of the team members.

"Brother Branham," he said. "You are wrong."

Jorgensen featured the incident in a chapter titled, “Satan Springs His Trap 1951.” Satan’s trap, according to Branham, included Bosworth’s rebuke and those who chose to follow the approved schedulesIn addition to Bosworth, the Branham team included Billy Paul Branham, Ern Baxter, Julius Stadsklev, and a group of South African ministers. 

According to Jorgensen, Branham and his team had just held a successful salvation-healing meeting in Johannesburg. Up to 17,000 people reportedly attended the meeting in which many healings occurred. After the final service, Baxter announced plans to visit another city.

“After breakfast, Ern Baxter came to Bill and said, “Brother Branham, I’ve got some news for you. I know you want to go to Durban, but rather than going straight there from Johannesburg, the National Committee has set up an itinerary that will take us over 1,000 miles south to Capetown, then up the east coast to Durban.”

That night, wrote Jorgensen, Branham had a vision in which an angel appeared to him.

“The angel folded his arms across his chest, gazed sternly at Bill and said, “Don’t go with those men down to Capetown. Stay here in Johannesburg for two more weeks of meetings. Tomorrow you will meet a man…”

The angel reportedly had a word about hunting. He said that Branham would meet a man named Sidney Jackson who operated a farm up north. “He is a great hunter and he can take you on a safari,” the angel said. “After two weeks in Johannesburg, you must take the next 10 days and go hunting with Sidney Jackson. Then go straight to Durban and stay there until I call you. If you will do these things, I will give you the country.”

Branham pouts

After the vision, Branham rushed to the room where Baxter, his manager, was staying. He said: “Brother Baxter, wake up. The angel of the Lord just met me and told me we can’t take that itinerary the National Committee set up.”

Baxter referred him to the Rev. A.J. Schoeman, head of the National Committee, the organization that approved the meetings for Branham. When Schoeman learned of Branham’s wish, he explained that they had to keep the itinerary: “We’ve already spent thousands of dollars on advertising, and the people are expecting you to be there.”

Branham disagreed and began to sulk, according to Jorgensen.

On Friday, Oct. 12, 1951, Branham and his team loaded into three cars and headed southwest to Klerksdorp. At one point along the way, Branham, who rode in the lead car, told the driver to stop the car. The driver pulled over and stopped. He asked the evangelist what was bothering him. Branham said he could not go any farther and that he must return to Johannesburg.

The two cars following them also stopped. Schoeman walked over to Baxter and Bosworth and told them that Branham "refuses to go south." He urged the two men to speak with Branham.

Baxter and Bosworth got out of their car and walked over to Branham. After listening to Branham, Bosworth told him he was wrong. “If you go south with these men, I believe you’re going to see exceedingly abundantly above all you could ask or think,” he said.

As far as Branham was concerned, Bosworth was not convincing. To Branham, “it felt like the knife of betrayal had stabbed him between his ribs,” wrote Jorgensen.

“Daddy Bosworth, I’m shocked at you! As many times as you’ve stood on the platform and heard me say, ‘thus saith the lord,’ has it ever been wrong?”

Averting his eyes from Bill’s accusing glare, Bosworth mumbled, “Well, this time I think you’re wrong.”

Jorgensen noted the angry response from the South African ministers who were present: “One man said angrily, ‘Don’t you think that God speaks to somebody else besides you?’” Branham responded by reminding them of Korah, who was swallowed by the earth after he challenged Moses.




Gordon Lindsay's concern

In sharing the above account, it is important to note that Jorgensen’s book is not a critical biography or an exercise in objective journalism. Rather, it is a secondary source on Branham’s life history that presents a hagiographical perspective on the evangelist. As such, it tries to portray him in the best light. Jorgensen has acknowledged that the content in the book came primarily from Branham’s messages. In the section, “Endnotes and Sources,” Jorgensen noted: “Most of the details in this biography come from the personal testimony of William Branham as recorded in his 1,100+ sermons between 1947 and 1965.”

Jorgensen also drew material from Stadsklev’s book, William Branham: A Prophet Visits South Africa (1952). Interestingly enough, Stadsklev mentioned the team’s trip to Klerksdorp, but he did not mention the argument.

While some of the claims in Jorgensen's book may be questionable, some of the incidents have been reported by other sources. For example, Branham’s tendency to cancel meetings was also noted by Gordon and Freda Lindsay.

In her book, My Diary Secrets (Christ For The Nations, 1976), Freda recounted a situation involving Branham and a series of meetings in Minneapolis, Minn. Branham had asked Gordon to arrange the meetings, which he did, and at great expense. However, the night before the meeting, Gordon became alarmed when he could not reach Branham by phone. He eventually sent someone to Branham’s house and “insisted that Brother Branham answer his phone.” Freda wrote:

Branham called him back and said that he just felt led not to come to Minneapolis. A little preacher friend of his not too far from where Brother Branham lived wanted a “little meeting” so he just decided to go there and help this dear brother.

Gordon, of course was rightfully distressed. He reminded Brother Branham that he had asked him to set up this meeting; that Gordon had spent thousands of dollars in having the tent made and in shipping it to Minneapolis, plus getting the seats, the advertising, renting the organ and piano, etc. In addition Gordon told him that all future meetings would be canceled unless Brother Branham was a man of his word and kept his appointments.

Brother Branham’s response was unbelievable – almost childish. He said very meekly, “Now Brother Gordon, if you really think I should come, I will get in the car and drive all night long to get there. I didn’t really think it made all that much difference.

To make a long story short, he did drive all that night and got in just in time to go to the platform to preach without having even a chance to change his clothes.





Lessons for the church

The incident between Branham and Bosworth is an example of what can happen with Christian leaders and the people who work with them. It presents a number of important lessons for the church.

Lesson 1:  Famous Christian leaders, no matter how gifted they may be, can still have flaws in some areas of their lives. Since nobody is perfect, nobody is always right. That includes the people who are charismatic, strong, and deeply admired.

Lesson 2: Christian leaders must dare to hold people accountable, including those they respect. No one should blindly follow anyone. Like Paul calling out Peter, Christians must take a stand and confront those who are found to be wrong in doctrine or in their behavior. Consider what Paul wrote in Galatians 2:11-13:

Paul Confronts Peter
But when Peter came to Antioch, I had to oppose him to his face, for what he did was very wrong. When he first arrived, he ate with the Gentile believers, who were not circumcised. But afterward, when some friends of James came, Peter wouldn’t eat with the Gentiles anymore. He was afraid of criticism from these people who insisted on the necessity of circumcision. As a result, other Jewish believers followed Peter’s hypocrisy, and even Barnabas was led astray by their hypocrisy. – New Living Translation (NLT)

Lesson 3: Christian leaders must have discernment. They should not be so emotional in their faith that they turn a blind eye to error. Instead, they should critically judge what they see and hear by the word of God. John wrote in 1 John 4:1:

Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, for many false prophets have gone out into the world. -- English Standard Version (ESV)

Lesson 4: Christian leaders will disagree on some issues. After all, they are human. In some cases, their disagreements may lead to heated arguments. Such was the case with Paul and Barnabas in Acts 15:36-41:

Disagreement Between Paul and Barnabas
Some time later Paul said to Barnabas, “Let us go back and visit the believers in all the towns where we preached the word of the Lord and see how they are doing.” Barnabas wanted to take John, also called Mark, with them, 38 but Paul did not think it wise to take him, because he had deserted them in Pamphylia and had not continued with them in the work. They had such a sharp disagreement that they parted company. Barnabas took Mark and sailed for Cyprus, but Paul chose Silas and left, commended by the believers to the grace of the Lord. He went through Syria and Cilicia, strengthening the churches. – New International Version (NIV)

Lesson 5: Christian leaders have public and private voices. Depending on the situation, they will share information "on the record" and sometimes "off the record." Like politicians, they also have official versions of events and actual versions. In Bosworth's case, he used his public voice to praise Branham in books and magazines; he used his private voice to rebuke the self-proclaimed prophet. Bosworth's public voice was about marketing and public relations, but his private voice was about correction and accountability.

In his public voice, Bosworth boasted about the accuracy of Branham's discernment and his words from the Lord. However, in his private voice, he said Branham was wrong.

Lesson 6: Christian leaders should move beyond their conflict. No one is helped by holding grudges. The leaders must find a way to forgive and be reconciled, and then move forward in their work for the Lord. Bosworth and Branham eventually moved on with their work and remained close in their fellowship until the end.

Conclusion

This article is presented to shed light and provide commentary on the little-known incident in which Branham was rebuked by the elderly Bosworth. The story, as written by Jorgensen, gives readers a behind-the-scene look at the Branham campaign in South Africa in 1951. The story is a reminder that great events, even in the church, may come with challenges, disputes, and errors in judgment. Revival meetings are not immune to problems. But God’s grace is sufficient. And he is patient and full of mercy, even when leaders fail or miss his perfect will.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Would you like to know more
about F.F. Bosworth?
Follow the Bosworth Matters blog! 
You can read it here.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For more information: 
Visit ffbosworth.strikingly.com. Questions about the research and commentary on F.F. Bosworth may be directed to Roscoe Barnes III, Ph.D., via email at doctorbarnes3@gmail.com or roscoebarnes3@yahoo.com. For updates on F.F. Bosworth history, simply follow this blog or @Roscoebarnes3 on Twitter. #ChristTheHealer

Forks of the Road features new history exhibits

Natchez National Historical Park has added new panels at the Forks of the Road slave market site, using U.S. Colored Troops pension records ...